1 |
On Monday, January 16, 2017 1:19:49 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> How would somebody sue "Gentoo" when Gentoo is just a trademark of |
4 |
> SPI? There would be no legal entity called Gentoo to sue. That's the |
5 |
> whole point. If somebody wants to sue SPI then that becomes SPI's |
6 |
> problem, though obviously as a project we would cooperate with them to |
7 |
> minimize this risk. |
8 |
|
9 |
Rather than sue the SPI, any action would likely be taken directly against an |
10 |
individual rather than go after the SPI for something Gentoo related. |
11 |
|
12 |
I do not believe the SPI will provide any legal indemnification or protection |
13 |
to Gentoo developers. The Gentoo Foundation can serve to indemnify, but making |
14 |
the Foundation target of any legal action rather than the individual. With the |
15 |
exception of criminal laws, as no entity can indemnify against criminal |
16 |
charges. |
17 |
|
18 |
There are many good reason to have a Gentoo Foundation. Legal protection of |
19 |
the Developers via indemnification is just one. |
20 |
|
21 |
-- |
22 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |