Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matt Turner <mattst88@g.o>
To: Gentoo project list <gentoo-project@l.g.o>
Cc: comrel <comrel@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: rfc: comrel changes
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:43:22
Message-Id: CAEdQ38FQFR3yvPhWn8GmH3ru+TKdTPXec7KAAYv74RczY54G8Q@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] rfc: comrel changes by William Hubbs
1 On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:18 AM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > All,
4 >
5 > I realize that comrel is a thankless job, but it is an important one
6 > that helps preserve the health of the community.
7 >
8 > To facilitate this, I think we need to have some changes in the way comrel
9 > operates, so I would like to propose them here to see what other folks think.
10 >
11 > Since comrel is a special TLP like QA, I think the comrel lead, like
12 > the qa lead, should be confirmed by the council.
13 >
14 > When an issue is filed with comrel, the issue should be addressed
15 > within a reasonable time frame. As someone who has filed issues, I have
16 > seen them sit for months with no action taken.
17 > With all respect to comrel, this is unacceptable. You have a published
18 > policy for how you will process issues, so follow it. If you don't, it
19 > is very upsetting for users/developers who reach out to you for
20 > assistance, weakens your credibility, and by extension negatively affects the
21 > reputation of the entire Gentoo community.
22 >
23 > To promote more transparency with comrel, I would like to
24 > require the comrel lead to send a report to the gentoo-project list monthly
25 > containing these statistics for the previous month:
26 >
27 > - number of bugs received
28 > - number of bugs pending (this is for bugs that are currently in process)
29 > - number of bugs resolved by actions (such as talking to
30 > developers or disciplinary action)
31 > - number of bugs closed without action
32 >
33 > - number of mediation requests received
34 > - number of mediation requests resolved
35 > - number of mediation requests escalated to bugs
36 > - number of mediation requests dismissed without action
37 >
38 > The comrel lead should be replaced if this report is not sent for three
39 > consecutive months.
40 >
41 > What do others think?
42
43 I think this is all very reasonable. I've both been in the position of
44 having (multiple) reports to ComRel ignored and also on the inside of
45 ComRel and seen reports languish.
46
47 I hope monthly reports can act as a forcing function for ComRel to be
48 more attentive.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: rfc: comrel changes William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>