1 |
On 13/11/16 01:48, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
2 |
> On 11/13/2016 02:45 AM, M. J. Everitt wrote: |
3 |
>> On 13/11/16 01:44, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 11/13/2016 02:40 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 8:24:12 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> In either case the person affected can appeal to Council which makes |
7 |
>>>>> the final decision. |
8 |
>>>> If a problem went from Team Lead, or Leads, to a vote from the entire council. |
9 |
>>>> An appeal should not be necessary. There should not be an appeal process or |
10 |
>>>> need. Such things should not occur and everyone should be doing everything |
11 |
>>>> possible to prevent it. Thus again nothing to appeal. |
12 |
>>>> |
13 |
>>> This is already the case where technical issues are discussed in a |
14 |
>>> professional manner not involving personal conflicts. |
15 |
>>> |
16 |
>>> |
17 |
>> With respect, Kristian, I really don't believe we have a problem with |
18 |
>> technical matters ... ;] |
19 |
>> |
20 |
> The description above is a normative description of how things works in |
21 |
> the general case, which doesn't involve comrel. The latter is only |
22 |
> involved when the usual dispute resolution is not applicable due to |
23 |
> personnel making technical issues personal. |
24 |
> |
25 |
Ok so for the sake of clarity, we have a purely technical issue, which |
26 |
is either right or wrong .. and then someone takes it as a personal |
27 |
affront, instead of being mature and professional, and accepting the |
28 |
correction, learning the lesson, to put into practise in future. So |
29 |
instead of the issue being purely technical .. said person MAKES it |
30 |
personal .. and therefore themselves causes a conflict .. which requires |
31 |
some form of Discipline .. which breeds hate .. and ... |
32 |
|
33 |
.. you see where I'm going .. ?! |