| 1 |
El lun, 02-03-2015 a las 00:02 -0500, Tim Harder escribió: |
| 2 |
> The next council meeting will be on March 10th, 19:00 UTC in |
| 3 |
> #gentoo-council on Freenode. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Please respond to this message on the gentoo-project list with any |
| 6 |
> agenda items you want to propose or discuss. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Thanks, |
| 9 |
> Tim |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Another topic I would like to rise is: |
| 12 |
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/aed760e7431f6d5ec7518be4d5b75c84 |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
But, over my original suggestion, I would be happy with even only having |
| 15 |
this: |
| 16 |
- A new keyword for bugzilla like "STABLEREQALL" to easily allow arch |
| 17 |
teams to filter this kind of packages and handle them in this "special |
| 18 |
way" |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
The keyword would be set by the maintainer of the package when he/she |
| 21 |
CCes the arches and, then, he is supposed to know if his package can be |
| 22 |
handled in this way or not. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
An important note: from this workflow, HPPA case should be excluded as |
| 25 |
his team was the only disagreeing with this (as pointed in that same |
| 26 |
thread). That is not a problem to me since I think HPPA team is in a |
| 27 |
good shape of stabilizations (as they have a stable tree that fits well |
| 28 |
with its current man power, that is not the case for the other arches). |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks a lot |
Archives