Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Require OpenPGP signatures from existing devs on new developer applications?
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:01:35
Message-Id: CAGfcS_=9e_Pqyj5=p2Si8rbz-hazMRu49iRoue-XQL_eL8W6yw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Require OpenPGP signatures from existing devs on new developer applications? by "William L. Thomson Jr."
1 On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:38 PM, William L. Thomson Jr.
2 <wlt-ml@××××××.com> wrote:
3 >
4 > Aspects need to be merged, whittled down till projects are fully staffed. Then
5 > and only then, with new developers, should new projects be created and adding
6 > bureaucracy, as needed. To much focus on utopian concepts rather than getting
7 > stuff done today!
8 >
9
10 This sounds a bit like "the beatings shall continue until morale
11 improves." I've yet to see a case when telling somebody that they're
12 not allowed to work on something that interests them results in
13 "getting stuff done" when there isn't a paycheck involved (and often
14 even when there is).
15
16 --
17 Rich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Require OpenPGP signatures from existing devs on new developer applications? "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com>