Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Tom Wijsman <TomWij@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: ssuominen@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 19:00:53
Message-Id: 20140509210040.61341e23@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 by Samuli Suominen
1 On Fri, 09 May 2014 21:45:05 +0300
2 Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote:
3
4 >
5 > On 09/05/14 21:37, Tom Wijsman wrote:
6 > >> It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of
7 > >> each package to determine it for himself, no global USE="gtk"
8 > >> possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use.
9 > > So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no
10 > > results.
11 > >
12 >
13 > I'm not so sure, it seems QA is picking policies as per what some loud
14 > people on the ML say as opposed to giving overwhelming technical
15 > arguments their proper weight
16 >
17 > I hope I'm wrong
18
19 You can inspect the meeting logs and/or summaries, it looks technical
20 to me; if we left some{one,thing} out, you're welcome to point that out.
21
22 --
23 With kind regards,
24
25 Tom Wijsman (TomWij)
26 Gentoo Developer
27
28 E-mail address : TomWij@g.o
29 GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D
30 GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 hasufell <hasufell@g.o>