1 |
On 21.02.2020 11:17, Luca Barbato wrote: |
2 |
> On 21/02/2020 00:40, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> If we are interested in transparency, how about the following 'radical' |
5 |
>> change: Let's make bugs *public*, at least for project members. In this |
6 |
>> way, each project member can form their own view/opinion based on real |
7 |
>> facts. |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> Maybe not from the beginning like some court hearings (trials) aren't |
10 |
>> public as well. But because ComRel is speaking 'in the name of the |
11 |
>> project', bugs should become accessible at least for project members |
12 |
>> when ComRel's job is done like court decision are usually published. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> We could do that but this would have some chilling effect. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> We also could do that the issues are opened only if all the people |
17 |
> involved agree to make them open to the project members. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I would not make them public and I would still require some modicum of |
20 |
> confidentiality. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> lu |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
|
26 |
...this is not to mention that some people who are somehow involved in |
27 |
ComRel cases explicitly ask us not to disclosure the data we receive as |
28 |
it may be considered sensitive even after some considerable amount of time. |