1 |
Zac Medico schrieb: |
2 |
>> 2011/12/4 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn <chithanh@g.o>: |
3 |
>>> I already stated that I would leave the call to zmedico as lead |
4 |
>>> developer of portage. Giving him the arguments and the data to make the |
5 |
>>> decision, but watching whether his reasoning is sound. That means |
6 |
>>> clearly saying where it is based on fact and where it is based on opinion. |
7 |
>>> (I wouldn't mind if he made an entirely opinion based decision, as long |
8 |
>>> as he didn't claim it to be fact-based) |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I think it's difficult or impossible to get an reasonably unbiased |
11 |
> sample of the population of Gentoo users as a whole. Voting is only fair |
12 |
> when you can get a reasonably unbiased sample of the whole population. |
13 |
|
14 |
This is something I can agree with. |
15 |
|
16 |
> Due to human nature, people who are unhappy with the change in defaults |
17 |
> are more likely to express their opinion publicly than people who |
18 |
> welcome the change in defaults. This tends to bias statistics in favor |
19 |
> of the unhappy people. |
20 |
|
21 |
But this is precisely what I meant above and in my older post. You have |
22 |
no idea to which extent this effect is present, much less whether other |
23 |
effects which could introduce bias in the other direction outweigh your |
24 |
"unhappy with the change in defaults" group. |
25 |
You keep on repeating this as if it were fact, but have no data to base |
26 |
this claim on. |
27 |
|
28 |
One way to investigate would be to sample statements in the forum |
29 |
thread, and determining how many responded with personal preference and |
30 |
how many with practical arguments. It would still have to be accounted |
31 |
for those who try to rationalize their pre-conceived opinion with ad-hoc |
32 |
arguments, but better than nothing at all which is the current case. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
Best regards, |
36 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |