1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA256
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:06:36 +0300
|
5 |
Mikle Kolyada <zlogene@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> |
8 |
> |
9 |
> On 26.04.2019 17:29, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
10 |
> > On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:25:57 +0200 |
11 |
> > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > > Why do you |
14 |
> > > presume that ComRel will never abuse its power, and at the same |
15 |
> > > time presume QA will kick people 'on a whim'? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> > comrel does not create any rule. QA does. That's called separation |
18 |
> > of powers. |
19 |
> If I understood you correctly, this is not particularly true. ComRel |
20 |
> changes its policy (because it belongs to ComRel, this is actually how |
21 |
> the proctors project was launched again), at the meantime QA changes |
22 |
> its policy, because GLEP48 is about QA. |
23 |
> The main difference is that ComRel does not have the GLEP describing |
24 |
> its duties, and that is why these changes attract less attention. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
What I meant is that being judge and party (what this QA change is
|
29 |
about) is a highway to abuses. This does not prevent all of them, but I
|
30 |
believe having them separate is a very important barrier.
|
31 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
32 |
|
33 |
iHUEAREIAB0WIQSpOxaxaZikKNVNlsYOJUi7xgflrgUCXMbBBQAKCRAOJUi7xgfl
|
34 |
riHKAPwJt8ogc74iU1O/D2TqL34WnruZBlwekMPzD/My6mwQ9QD8CpnJq5oxUSt0
|
35 |
RRTtSG364yGbzHk5bdUISnGL0eQ1rZg=
|
36 |
=CXJ/
|
37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |