Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation | ||
| Date: | Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:46:31 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_nY6xcmNW7Vc+aid0KoHJt-yzkZcsQs9=OvFKJaCc0fPg@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation by "Robin H. Johnson" |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robbat2@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > - Augment/replace rsync with git repo that has thick-Manifests, changelogs, metadata |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | |
| 5 | You're missing an option to replace rsync with a git repo that has |
| 6 | metadata, but not the other stuff. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Of course, this already exists and no doubt many are using it. It |
| 9 | just isn't official. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | I'm fine with Changelogs going away entirely, in any case. That's |
| 12 | what git is for. If people want to spend time dynamically generating |
| 13 | them, it isn't harmful to do so. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | -- |
| 16 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> |