Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@×××××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: PMS
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 16:27:41
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Re: PMS by Steve Long
On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:31:38 +0000
Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
> I agree that the EAPI is not fixed until it's agreed and implemented > by portage. The PMS thing seems extraneous to Gentoo needs atm; it's > more to enable other projects to interoperate with the tree. It > certainly wasn't needed for pkgcore imo.
Erm. You need to learn the relationship between EAPI and PMS. PMS describes EAPIs 0 and 1, and will describe any future EAPIs once they're agreed upon. -- Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
[gentoo-project] Re: Re: PMS Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk>