Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev-announce@l.g.o, gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2016-03-13
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 16:54:57
Message-Id: 22240.21849.583685.358207@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2016-03-13 by "Andreas K. Hüttel"
1 >>>>> On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Andreas K Hüttel wrote:
2
3 >> The next council meeting will be on Sunday 2016-03-13, 19:00 UTC
4 >> in the #gentoo-council channel on Freenode.
5
6 > After talking to Ulrich, here's still one more agenda item:
7
8 > Since we regularly get into discussions about PMS versus "historical
9 > behaviour" (see e.g. USE=multislot), I'm asking the concil to
10 > decide along the following lines:
11
12 > 1) All pre-PMS, non-PMS-conformant behaviour should be considered
13 > deprecated immediately.
14 > 2) We encourage creation of trackers to hunt down and kill pre-PMS,
15 > non-PMS-conformant behaviour of ebuilds, eclasses, package managers
16 > 3) We introduce a hard deadline when all this should be fixed.
17
18 Updated agenda:
19
20 1. Roll call
21 2. GLEP 42 update [1,2]
22 3. Historical behaviour vs PMS (see above)
23 4. Open bugs with council involvement [3]
24 5. Open floor
25
26
27 [1] https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/b9460b9c8d578c3498c217c17b75afd4
28 [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568068
29 [3] https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=IN_PROGRESS&email2=council%40gentoo.org&emailassigned_to2=1&emailcc2=1&emailreporter2=1&emailtype2=substring&list_id=3096302&query_format=advanced

Replies