1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
I'm trying to put together a survey about the Nitrokey units that the |
4 |
Foundation arranged for devs. |
5 |
|
6 |
The rough goals: |
7 |
- measure shipping results [=> quantitative, at least one dev had their shipment returned] |
8 |
- measure usage [=> quantitative, was this a waste?] |
9 |
- measure satisfaction with nitrokey units [=> qualitative] |
10 |
|
11 |
I'm planning on using Google Forms for this, because I'm familiar with |
12 |
that as a survey platform. |
13 |
|
14 |
I'm not going to spin up an entire survey system just keep it entirely |
15 |
libre. I do plan on publishing the results of the survey, with some |
16 |
parts made anonymous/redacted. |
17 |
|
18 |
The form will NOT require sign-in, but there will be a field for |
19 |
entering your developer name. |
20 |
|
21 |
I would appreciate both public & private input, both about this as a |
22 |
survey, and meta-input about future surveys to measure success of |
23 |
particular programs. |
24 |
|
25 |
Draft questions: |
26 |
---------------- |
27 |
|
28 |
Setup: |
29 |
- Dev Username [textfield] |
30 |
|
31 |
Shipping: |
32 |
- Did you order a nitrokey unit? boolean |
33 |
- When did you placed the order (optional) Y/M/D |
34 |
- When did you received the order (optional) Y/M/D |
35 |
- How many nitrokey units did you actually receive? [integer] |
36 |
- Did you have to pay any additional charges to receive the unit? |
37 |
- If so, how much did you pay? [numeric] |
38 |
COMMENT: I want to be able to adjust this question to both per-country |
39 |
cost-of-living and socioeconomic level of different developers within |
40 |
a country. See the demographics at the end. |
41 |
- If so, what were the nature of the charges (e.g. customs) [freetext] |
42 |
- Additional: If you did not receive the order, or got more than one, |
43 |
can you summarize what happened? [freetext] Please do not |
44 |
self-identify in the text. |
45 |
|
46 |
Usage: |
47 |
- Note: per-developer commit count will be extracted from Git |
48 |
- What percentage of your commits use the on-device key? (0..100% in 25% increments) |
49 |
- Did you use the units for non-commit signing or encryption? [boolean] |
50 |
- If so, how often? [many times a day, daily, weekly, monthly] |
51 |
|
52 |
Satisfaction: |
53 |
- What setup tooling documentation did you use: [select-many] |
54 |
- Gentoo wiki |
55 |
- Nitrokey docs |
56 |
- Other doc (freetext) |
57 |
- Figured it out by hacking it |
58 |
- Did you find the setup tooling easy to use? [1-5 scale] |
59 |
- Do you find regular usage of the tooling & unit easy? [1-5 scale] |
60 |
- Does the tooling & unit work consistently? [1-5 scale] |
61 |
- Would you have considered purchasing a Nitrokey if the Foundation did |
62 |
not fund it, and cost was not a problem? [1-5 scale] |
63 |
- If you encountered problems, can you summarize some of them? |
64 |
[freetext] Please do not self-identify in the text |
65 |
- What do you feel could have been done better? |
66 |
[freetext] Please do not self-identify in the text |
67 |
|
68 |
Demographics, all optional: |
69 |
- Where are you located: [textfield, ISO country code] |
70 |
- Age bracket [0-17, 18-25, 25-35, 35-45, 45-55, 55-65, 65+] |
71 |
- For your country, what is your household income level, relative to the |
72 |
median income? [select-one] |
73 |
- Decline to answer |
74 |
- Significantly below [<=50% below] |
75 |
- Below [20-50% below] |
76 |
- About the same [20% either side of median] |
77 |
- Above [20-50% above] |
78 |
- Significantly above [>=50% above] |
79 |
COMMENT: This is specifically to identify need where developers |
80 |
would have trouble purchasing hardware. The complex wording of the |
81 |
question is meant to improve anonymity while identifying socioeconomic |
82 |
need. |
83 |
|
84 |
-- |
85 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
86 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
87 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
88 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
89 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |