1 |
On Thu, 15 May 2008 17:29:56 -0400 |
2 |
Richard Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> Did this meeting have sufficient notice to be considered an official |
4 |
> meeting? Normally bylaws that govern matters like these also |
5 |
> stipulate that meetings have a certain notice process to ensure that |
6 |
> everybody knows about them. |
7 |
|
8 |
The bylaws that govern this matter are GLEP 39. GLEP 39 lets the Council |
9 |
decide when they hold meetings and how they go about it (so long as |
10 |
they at least have one open meeting per month). The Council decided at |
11 |
the end of their previous meeting to hold a second meeting, so it |
12 |
clearly counts -- it wasn't like it was one person saying "we're having |
13 |
a meeting in five minutes because I say so, and if people don't show up |
14 |
they get slacker marks!"... |
15 |
|
16 |
-- |
17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |