| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 02-08-2011 16:15, Fabian Groffen wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> Right, which means to me that if the council agrees on a certain |
| 6 |
>>> change to GLEP39, it has to organise a full developer vote with |
| 7 |
>>> all the supporting material for the change. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> But, you are saying that the council has to approve changes for |
| 10 |
>> glep 39 before they can come to a vote. This would mean that say a |
| 11 |
>> majority of developers doesn't like something in glep 39, but the |
| 12 |
>> council doesn't approve the change. That change will never come to |
| 13 |
>> a vote. In other words, the council has control of the rules that |
| 14 |
>> govern it. Is that what you are intending? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I think yes, if the council regarding GLEP39 thinks A, but the dev |
| 17 |
> population B, then it is unlikely the council will vote for B. |
| 18 |
> However, the dev population should vote for other council members |
| 19 |
> that do support B for the next term in that case. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> You have all rights of course to try and persuade the council members |
| 22 |
> to change their minds and vote for B. Probably good argumentation |
| 23 |
> will help there. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I strongly disagree on this since I support that any change to GLEP39 |
| 26 |
will require a global dev vote, which means that even if the council |
| 27 |
starts a discussion and guides the process for GLEP39 reform, in the end |
| 28 |
it will fall to the full developer community to approve it or not. |
| 29 |
I do think that the council should have an active role in GLEP39 reform |
| 30 |
and that it's natural for the council to "lead" on this process. If |
| 31 |
we're able to get this moving forward, I would be open to having the |
| 32 |
council nominate a person or committee to spearhead the process. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
- -- |
| 35 |
Regards, |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Jorge Vicetto (jmbsvicetto) - jmbsvicetto at gentoo dot org |
| 38 |
Gentoo- forums / Userrel / Devrel / KDE / Elections / RelEng |
| 39 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 40 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) |
| 41 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJOOLHkAAoJEC8ZTXQF1qEP9SAP/1cWsfXQOGA8igd87PBZ3kHg |
| 44 |
FxtbzH6On68v+8HsaZnPsFhnb/ApX3qE3V9XF0I+oVUEl5qImjKnxVedvS0j5SB2 |
| 45 |
yh/NHXWs75jzpjCr5C81afSO47KFm3AmmnM3RllUYT6pVUe5RKF2IcYQcFf3MdsY |
| 46 |
uyE1S1w80lF3sg8iuBWZEF8X3cQ9p5nZ4UiPy99Ch0rkYokc6XI+fppX6vYrRncE |
| 47 |
sk/N0rYBN1c4YNkCI/xj7dt0XYwkeA9rLOb+o519sBhz7nWZvQdYkyNkOYGoQT2H |
| 48 |
XCxzoTOZ0P30TVdxMFANuqG6bLuk/0wWnAUlBJR9YD6MazQbovxepI5lmIigRnrH |
| 49 |
la0s06FiVJcE8AUySyrBng/woVrZU2Sw2ZRZvbgI004VXDL43tj03e0TcP1WWemS |
| 50 |
UoCQBNOxWRSObKy7NKpAobftzjsdtEQytEwIfjITCHu+Ql9PyRT/Oc7x2GMunJDK |
| 51 |
yi1koCi227OEob9Q8EqHjFlS8WXS8RjF2mNYi/D8NgzlOLAuqSmpJP6XUT+awJOG |
| 52 |
h7WxDuXuK+tOB+TIwHsbVGx9PJ/jeZdYdM7cXnQk+YuAogJvkD9XcA4z6sCGcyLt |
| 53 |
/Wsg1p1j0cbW8KtwW/WmdKWSV75Q0FXzs7y+8UM6401odNoSs0Qak+H0lnGD3yqc |
| 54 |
OijkHtKfbzbZPogkGUZZ |
| 55 |
=LglL |
| 56 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives