| 1 |
On 16/11/14 02:00, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 11/15/2014 03:44 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 16/11/14 00:43, hasufell wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> We should recruit less people and instead make an effort to review other |
| 7 |
>>>> peoples overlays and include a list of high-quality overlays on our website. |
| 8 |
>>>> |
| 9 |
>>>> The good part is: any dev can do this and it moves away from our broken |
| 10 |
>>>> centralized packaging model. |
| 11 |
>>>> In addition, this will take off workload from the recruiters team. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>>> High-quality, reviewed overlays is a good idea. We still need more |
| 14 |
>>> recruiters though. |
| 15 |
>>> |
| 16 |
>> |
| 17 |
>> ++ |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
>> I'm all for implementing a more distributed model, though I think it |
| 20 |
>> would take a bit more than just a list of overlays (we need better |
| 21 |
>> policies around eclass changes and the like, unless we want overlays |
| 22 |
>> to fork them). That said, we've talked about that many times and |
| 23 |
>> until we're happily buzzing along with 47 high-quality overlays let's |
| 24 |
>> not turn off the developer production factory. |
| 25 |
>> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Turning it off will decrease organizational problems, make the |
| 28 |
> distribution more focused and eventually more high quality, because |
| 29 |
> people would be able to actually work together on the _core_ of gentoo |
| 30 |
> (toolchain, base-system, eclasses, PM...). |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> So, I was specifically talking about a distributed model _opposed_ to |
| 33 |
> adding new "developers" every time we are short on a team. |
| 34 |
> |
| 35 |
> Of course, this would also require us to actually work together _with_ |
| 36 |
> the community. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
When can we expect your announcement of a new project working towards a |
| 39 |
more distributed model? |
Archives