| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 8. Februar 2018, 23:39:21 CET schrieb Matthew Thode: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> > Membership may be terminated by a majority vote of the board of trustees. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > No explanation required. Right now, it sounds like the trustees may need |
| 6 |
> > to |
| 7 |
> > justify that the member is acting contrary to the purpose(s) of the |
| 8 |
> > Foundation. When really, no justification should be required (it just |
| 9 |
> > opens |
| 10 |
> > the door for endless argument, grumpiness, and thus more likely to lead to |
| 11 |
> > legal action). At the very least, it should say that the trustees can |
| 12 |
> > remove anyone *they feel* (ie. based on *their opinion*, which can't be |
| 13 |
> > argued) is acting poorly. That removes the possibility of debate. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Agreed, this is the only improvement I see us making to that specific |
| 16 |
> bylaw. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I agree that this modification of the bylaws makes sense. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
(Just that I'll mercilessly get back to these e-mails here when I'm ever asked |
| 21 |
to publicly justify a comrel decision again.) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 25 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 27 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives