1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Micha³ Górny wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>> I was more thinking about support files for Emacs, where we do this |
4 |
>> all the time: If the file is included with the upstream package, |
5 |
>> it's being installed by that package's ebuild. Otherwise, it will |
6 |
>> go into its own separate package. (And I guess it is similar for |
7 |
>> Vim.) |
8 |
|
9 |
> That's very inconsistent and therefore problematic for users. Some |
10 |
> packages work out-of-the-box, others require manually merging |
11 |
> additional packages... |
12 |
|
13 |
There's nothing inconsistent about it. Different upstream, different |
14 |
versioning scheme, different release cycles, therefore it goes into |
15 |
its own package. Everything else would just be messy. |
16 |
|
17 |
I guess it often would be a case for SDEPEND, but we don't have that |
18 |
yet. |
19 |
|
20 |
Ulrich |