Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 19:51:00
Message-Id: 20920.53531.334716.351193@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by Markos Chandras
1 >>>>> On Wed, 12 Jun 2013, Micha³ Górny wrote:
2
3 >> I was more thinking about support files for Emacs, where we do this
4 >> all the time: If the file is included with the upstream package,
5 >> it's being installed by that package's ebuild. Otherwise, it will
6 >> go into its own separate package. (And I guess it is similar for
7 >> Vim.)
8
9 > That's very inconsistent and therefore problematic for users. Some
10 > packages work out-of-the-box, others require manually merging
11 > additional packages...
12
13 There's nothing inconsistent about it. Different upstream, different
14 versioning scheme, different release cycles, therefore it goes into
15 its own package. Everything else would just be messy.
16
17 I guess it often would be a case for SDEPEND, but we don't have that
18 yet.
19
20 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>