Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 17:22:52
Message-Id: ulf5u9ulc@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items by "Robin H. Johnson"
1 >>>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2021, Robin H Johnson wrote:
2
3 > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 07:43:08PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 >> >>>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2021, Robin H Johnson wrote:
5 >>
6 >> > key:
7 >> > name of contributor and/or their associated unique email address
8 >> > (emails should not be duplicated in the keys)
9 >> > value:
10 >> > a list of entities who may own the copyright to parts of commits
11 >> > the developer has made
12 >> Can value be empty, if the contributor themself holds the copyright?
13 >> IIUC, YAML syntax would allow it.
14 > Yes, I feel that would be a valid entry.
15
16 > We'd just have to add an explicit ":" on the end of the lines we have
17 > right now.
18
19 As discussed in the meeting:
20
21 <@ulm> my impression is that this is not ready for a vote yet, because
22 there was no feedback from the entity listed in the AUTHORS file
23 <@dilfridge> this proposal is somewhat pointless if we do not have any
24 feedback from $CORPORATION people first
25 <@ulm> yes :)
26 <@gyakovlev> I have a feeling not enough discussion happened yet.
27 <@sam_> agreed
28 <@gyakovlev> especially with copyright holders in that file
29 <@ulm> let's postpone then
30 <@mgorny> do we want to assign someone from the Council to work on it?
31 <@dilfridge> so I suggest we ask robbat2 to obtain that feedback in
32 detail first
33
34 @robbat2: Could you try to get feedback from the currently listed
35 entities whether they are fine with the proposed change?
36
37 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature