| 1 |
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Last I was actively working on it, I was about to start coding the git |
| 4 |
> commit validation hook. But got injured/concussion that put that on |
| 5 |
> hold. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I'd encourage discussion of this bit at least on the appropriate lists |
| 8 |
(gentoo-scm?). My only concern is that validating git commits |
| 9 |
requires knowing what a valid git commit looks like, and that might |
| 10 |
involve some number of assumptions about how we intend to use git. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
This is actually one of the areas surrounding the migration that |
| 13 |
hasn't been fully baked. I'm sure everybody has a sense in their head |
| 14 |
of how things will work, but I'm not convinced that everybody's |
| 15 |
notions are the same. There has been discussion in the past about |
| 16 |
merge vs rebase and so on, and that can have an impact on just what |
| 17 |
commits actually end up in our tree, and who if anybody has signed all |
| 18 |
of them. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Definitely don't want to slow you down. I just don't want you to end |
| 21 |
up getting burned if things don't go as you expected. Also, I'm |
| 22 |
interested in how you figured everything would work in part because it |
| 23 |
might help the rest of us make up our minds... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Rich |
Archives