| 1 |
Alec Warner schrieb: |
| 2 |
> I'd consider alternatives like: |
| 3 |
> - A period where the commits need review. |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
That is something which I could get behind. This could even be implemented in |
| 6 |
an automated way (checking for Reviewed-By: in the commit). But this is as |
| 7 |
far as QA disciplinary powers should go, and ComRel should take it from there. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Because other than that I don't trust QA at all to make disciplinary |
| 10 |
decisions based on policy. In the past, a package maintained by me has been |
| 11 |
on the receiving end of QA actions (in violation of tree removal policy) |
| 12 |
based on ad hoc made up rules[1]. After QA tried again for a second time[2], |
| 13 |
I had to ask Council to step in and put an end to this, which they did |
| 14 |
fortunately[3]. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
That was all a long while back, but I have seen similar tree removal policy |
| 17 |
violations on several packages after that by the QA team, so I don't think |
| 18 |
the situation has changed a lot. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361181 |
| 26 |
[2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=414997 |
| 27 |
[3] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20121113-summary.txt |
Archives