| 1 |
On 21/02/2020 00:40, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> If we are interested in transparency, how about the following 'radical' |
| 4 |
> change: Let's make bugs *public*, at least for project members. In this |
| 5 |
> way, each project member can form their own view/opinion based on real |
| 6 |
> facts. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Maybe not from the beginning like some court hearings (trials) aren't |
| 9 |
> public as well. But because ComRel is speaking 'in the name of the |
| 10 |
> project', bugs should become accessible at least for project members |
| 11 |
> when ComRel's job is done like court decision are usually published. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
We could do that but this would have some chilling effect. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
We also could do that the issues are opened only if all the people |
| 16 |
involved agree to make them open to the project members. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I would not make them public and I would still require some modicum of |
| 19 |
confidentiality. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
lu |
Archives