| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 12:48:02PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:36:32PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> > W dniu pon, 04.09.2017 o godzinie 19∶22 +0200, użytkownik David Seifert |
| 4 |
> > napisał: |
| 5 |
> > > Hi William, |
| 6 |
> > > |
| 7 |
> > > given the massive inactivity of the sparc and hppa arches, I would like |
| 8 |
> > > to request dropping their profiles to 'dev'. I would like two votes: |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > 1) Should sparc be dropped to a 'dev' profile? |
| 11 |
> > > |
| 12 |
> > > 2) Should hppa be dropped to a 'dev' profile? |
| 13 |
> > > |
| 14 |
> > > I hope this can clear a lot of the STABLEREQ and KEYWORDREQ backlog |
| 15 |
> > > that is making maintenance in Gentoo cumbersome. |
| 16 |
> > > |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> > Weren't we discussing moving them to ~arch? I don't like marking |
| 19 |
> > profiles non-stable because it disables CI checks on pull requests, so |
| 20 |
> > whatever people do with those keywords, we no longer verify it. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Moving to dev means repoman doesn't scream about things, that's the |
| 23 |
> cleaner way to go imo. Also, that means we don't have to go through the |
| 24 |
> tree and change keywords everywhere. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I would like to add a couple of things. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
<council hat> |
| 29 |
The arch teams can do this themselves without going through the council, |
| 30 |
so I see it as coming to us only due to the inactivity of the arch teams. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
For me, the question should be, have the arch teams been inactive long |
| 33 |
enough that maintenance is being hindered in Gentoo? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
If yes, we should allow it. |
| 36 |
</council hat> |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
As a base-system maintainer, I am concerned about the lack of response |
| 39 |
on stabilizing OpenRC-0.28. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Thanks, |
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
William |
Archives