| 1 |
Dnia 2015-04-05, o godz. 20:47:51 |
| 2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > How git is relevant I don't really see, you'd still have to re-test all |
| 7 |
> > involved packages, so the effort is mostly in testing and not in running |
| 8 |
> > ekeyword in a loop. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> If you removed stable keywords from 300 packages, they would be in a |
| 12 |
> single git commit. That means you can restore those keywords in a |
| 13 |
> single command once you've checked that the new library can be made |
| 14 |
> stable. The benefit of git is that tree-wide operations are atomic. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Which is a moot point since once user gets hit by 300 packages |
| 17 |
suddenly going ~arch, he has no point in using stable anymore. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives