| 1 |
From my vantage point (R:U has never sat well with me), this is a grand |
| 2 |
idea, Michal! |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
+1 |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
*--* |
| 9 |
*Oakland Finish Up Weekend* |
| 10 |
Be Amazed. Be Amazing. |
| 11 |
Get Mentored | Get Inspired | *Finish* *Up* |
| 12 |
http://oaklandfinishup.com |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. <phajdan.jr@g.o> |
| 16 |
wrote: |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> On 29/03/2017 11:29, Marek Szuba wrote: |
| 19 |
> > On 2017-03-29 09:56, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 20 |
> >> How would you feel about removing/disabling the UPSTREAM resolution, |
| 21 |
> >> and expecting developers to use UPSTREAM keyword + regular |
| 22 |
> >> resolution? Any other ideas? |
| 23 |
> > In light of all the clearly demonstrated ambiguity, I would say it's a |
| 24 |
> > good idea. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> +1 |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> I like the simplification - it's easier to figure out what resolution to |
| 29 |
> pick. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Paweł |
| 32 |
> |
| 33 |
> |
Archives