| 1 |
Am Montag, 12. Februar 2018, 03:29:49 CET schrieb Rich Freeman: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> However, in the past the Council members who were on Comrel disagreed |
| 4 |
> with this and recused themselves. They can do that, but I think it is |
| 5 |
> harmful. I'm sure many reading my email think that my approach would |
| 6 |
> be harmful. That's ok - it is fine if a majority of Gentoo devs are |
| 7 |
> wrong on something. :) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Rich, |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
on an abstract level I agree fully with you on this. There's two things |
| 13 |
though. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
1) Had I not recused myself in the appeal case a year (?) ago, then a |
| 16 |
discussion like the one now would have cast doubt on the appeal result. Since |
| 17 |
we like to senselessly bikeshed just about everything, that was predictable. |
| 18 |
So the outcome was cleaner this way. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
2) It was rather amusing to leisurely stand on the side for a change and see |
| 21 |
you all wade through the mud, without having to do it myself once more. I |
| 22 |
think you can appreciate that since you handled nearly all the correspondence |
| 23 |
for the remaining "non-recused" council in that case... |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Cheers, |
| 26 |
Andreas |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 30 |
dilfridge@g.o |
| 31 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 32 |
(council, toolchain, perl, libreoffice, comrel) |
Archives