| 1 |
On 10/01/2013 07:22 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/01/2013 07:34 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/01/2013 06:27 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On 10/01/2013 03:12 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>>> That isn't to say that I won't fairly evaluate appeals, but I'm |
| 7 |
>>>> not going to second-guess every little temporary list ban. |
| 8 |
>>> |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>> No one here dares to ban long-term trolls from the list. They |
| 11 |
>>> are tolerated. |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
>> This contributes nothing to the discussion does it? From what I |
| 15 |
>> can tell, it's you who are trolling right now and tries to derail |
| 16 |
>> the discussion. The ComRel was formed only a week ago and no trolls |
| 17 |
>> have appeared since then. Or do you just want us to start banning |
| 18 |
>> people to prove that we are willing to do it? |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> No, I'm just explaining my view on the usefulness of shaping CoC |
| 22 |
> wording and stating that our MLs are practically not moderated. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> That is not trolling. So yes, it is yet to prove that something has |
| 25 |
> actually changed. Do you want me to open a new thread for this comment? |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
We do not need to prove anything to anyone. The fact that *you* can't |
| 29 |
see ComRel operating, it does not mean we are idling. The mailing lists |
| 30 |
are not practically moderated because we assumed that people are capable |
| 31 |
to have professional discussions. Clearly we were wrong and I already |
| 32 |
announced our intention to changed that. Like I said, that e-mail was |
| 33 |
send only a week ago and since then we haven't seen any problem. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
Regards, |
| 37 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 38 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives