| 1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 06.01.2017 kell 11:30, kirjutas Yury German: |
| 2 |
> OK we can do all of that. |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Would a notary document verifying the person that is Mailed to a |
| 5 |
> party (pick an address and a responsible person), be enough to |
| 6 |
> authenticate the person for the original GPG Web of Trust? In my |
| 7 |
> opinion if lets say I was the one receiving the document that has be |
| 8 |
> signed by a notary public, with a GPG key fingerprint on that form, |
| 9 |
> and a photo verification by the Notary (Legally binding document). |
| 10 |
> Then I would say that they are who they say they are. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Any opinions? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
This is just insane. We already suffer with unwillingness of people to |
| 15 |
become a developer with all the process involved. Until these are |
| 16 |
resolved, throwing more in is just unacceptable. Period. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
> Just an FYI on the cost. In most places a Notary Public is free at |
| 19 |
> the bank (In US), or a cost of $5 or under. Not sure about other |
| 20 |
> countries though. We do not want to make this cost prohibitive. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The procedure or cost should not exist, or reimbursed with time cost as |
| 23 |
well. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
But lets not go crazy here with the bureaucracy, Ok? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
You don't need to know who I am, you are not getting my copyright |
| 28 |
assignment anyways. But you are getting my contributions under an open |
| 29 |
source license. Lets have more people willing to do so, not throw in |
| 30 |
hurdles. |
Archives