Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Aaron Bauman <bman@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 07:02:25
Message-Id: ueeccylft@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council meeting 2021-07-11 - call for agenda items by Aaron Bauman
1 >>>>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2021, Aaron Bauman wrote:
2
3 > On Mon, Jul 05, 2021 at 11:42:36PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
4 >> The point is that banning an EAPI doesn't have any noticeable effect.
5 >> For example, if you look at EAPI 0 (banned on 2016-01-10) and EAPI 4
6 >> (banned on 2018-04-08), there's neither a cusp nor any change of slope
7 >> visible for the curves plotted here:
8 >> https://www.akhuettel.de/~huettel/plots/eapi.php
9
10 > We have had the issue in the past. Taking 1 minute to vote on a ban of
11 > an EAPI in a council meeting is a minute task and enforces the goals
12 > of the project.
13
14 But we don't actually enforce the ban. Doing so would mean adding the
15 EAPI to eapis-banned in layout.conf, which in turn would imply that
16 commits of (new or existing) ebuilds with a banned EAPI would be
17 rejected.
18
19 Ulrich

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies