1 |
On Saturday, December 15, 2018 8:40:38 PM PST Matt Turner wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2018 at 11:16 PM Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > - Disk usage for git vs rsync |
4 |
> |
5 |
> This is why I have not switched. With git you pull down increasing |
6 |
> amounts of history, whereas with rsync the data fits easily in a <1GB |
7 |
> partition. |
8 |
|
9 |
Recent portage can use sync-depth = 1 |
10 |
repo dir no longer grows as it used to and it's works fine unlike initial |
11 |
implementation that was giving trouble |
12 |
|
13 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/552814 |
14 |
|
15 |
du -hs /var/db/repos/gentoo |
16 |
350M /var/db/repos/gentoo |
17 |
|
18 |
example /etc/portage/repos.conf/gentoo.conf : |
19 |
[DEFAULT] |
20 |
main-repo = gentoo |
21 |
|
22 |
[gentoo] |
23 |
auto-sync = yes |
24 |
location = /var/db/repos/gentoo |
25 |
sync-type = git |
26 |
sync-uri = https://github.com/gentoo-mirror/gentoo.git |
27 |
sync-depth = 1 |
28 |
sync-git-clone-extra-opts = -b master |
29 |
sync-git-verify-commit-signature = true |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
sync is almost instantaneous compared to rsync, but some folks not going to |
33 |
like github as a mirror in this case. |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Georgy Yakovlev |
38 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |