Re: [gentoo-project] EAPI bump should require revbump

[Matthew Thode]

On 10/19/2012 08:52 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about this, so
> following up here..
>
> Due to the fact that an EAPI-bump can imply different behaviour from
> eclasses or the PM, an EAPI-bump should in most cases also require an
> ebuild revbump.
>
> Why i'm bringing this up here, is because Chansaw and I were wondering
> if common sense will not be enough to ensure this and it should be
> made a policy to revbump when migrating to a new EAPI ?
>
>

Well, it makes sense that it requires it, but better to make it well
known then to rely on common sense.

-- 
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)