| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> And spend much more time trying to find them silly logfiles now that we hide |
| 3 |
> the output. I really enjoy having to fix yet another bad default everywhere |
| 4 |
> just so I see *why* things fail ... |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Unless something has changed the logfile name including full path is |
| 7 |
printed when there is an error. So, it is just a matter of copy/paste |
| 8 |
into a cat and you can watch the whole thing scroll by and even |
| 9 |
pretend it is compiling really fast while it is doing it. :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It seems like a pretty sane default to assume that most packaged build |
| 12 |
without issues - after all, that is basically the goal, right? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That is probably why the forum post is at 52-48 - it really isn't that |
| 15 |
obvious a call one way or the other. In any case, it doesn't affect |
| 16 |
me anyway since I use parallel build and I trust the Council to at |
| 17 |
least provide some kind of closure... |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Rich |
Archives