| 1 |
Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 5 |
>>>> It seems to me that William posted something that someone else didn't |
| 6 |
>>>> like. |
| 7 |
>>> That seems like a pretty big assumption. How do you know that it has |
| 8 |
>>> something to do with something he posted? |
| 9 |
>> OK. Are you saying he did nothing wrong and was banned from a mailing |
| 10 |
>> list, resigned as trustee and retired as a developer for doing nothing |
| 11 |
>> at all? |
| 12 |
> No, I'm saying that you have no idea what led to these concerns. It |
| 13 |
> might or might not have something to do with something he posted |
| 14 |
> (which to me implies something written on an online public forum). |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
And I thought I said that in my first reply. When I say it seems, it |
| 17 |
means that that is what it looks like. Since you likely have no more |
| 18 |
info on this than I do, you don't know that either, right? Maybe this |
| 19 |
will help: |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/seem |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
>> In this |
| 25 |
>> situation tho, it seems that William has not been advised of that |
| 26 |
>> decision, if one was made at all. |
| 27 |
> How do you know what William was or was not advised of? |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Because of his posts, it would seem he was not. Otherwise, why would he |
| 30 |
keep asking what it is he is appealing? It wouldn't make sense to |
| 31 |
appeal his 15 day suspension that ended ages ago would it? Something |
| 32 |
else was decided that is preventing him from returning and if he doesn't |
| 33 |
know, then it would seem he was not told. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
> |
| 37 |
>> Personally, based on William's posts here, it doesn't |
| 38 |
>> seem that a official decision was made. |
| 39 |
> And why would you expect his posts here to shed light on what is |
| 40 |
> happening? Anything "official" on this matter isn't going to be |
| 41 |
> published on a mailing list. |
| 42 |
> |
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
Which is why he should take this to the council. I'm not sure that |
| 45 |
appeal is the right term for it but I guess it would be a start at |
| 46 |
least. ;-) |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
Dale |
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
:-) :-) |
Archives