Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Alec Warner <antarus@g.o>
To: Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project <gentoo-project@l.g.o>, trustees <trustees@g.o>
Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 19:11:11
Message-Id: CAAr7Pr9sBM6esxSTd7P0iRSM9KkDFZjtCTPxdYFJsuodGM1+2A@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS by Patrick Lauer
1 On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote:
2
3 > Good $timezonegreeting,
4 >
5 > The README at both
6 >
7 > https://github.com/coreos/portage-stable
8 > and
9 >
10 > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/portage-stable/+/master/README
11 >
12 > claims that:
13 >
14 > """
15 > Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved.
16 > Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
17 > found in the LICENSE file.
18 > """
19 >
20 > Since this is a copy of Gentoo ebuilds this is demonstrably wrong, the
21 > copyrights on the files themselves are intact. Copyright is obviously
22 > Gentoo Foundation, and license is GPL-2.
23 >
24 > I have been unable to find a proper contact for both repositories, so I
25 > hope people that know who to contact are reading this.
26 >
27
28 I will let the correct people at Google know.
29
30 -A
31
32
33 >
34 > Once this is corrected I'd strongly suggest to both downstreams to poste
35 > a prominent notice to inform all downstream users of this issue to avoid
36 > accidental license violations.
37 >
38 >
39 > Have fun,
40 >
41 > Patrick
42 >
43 >
44 >

Replies