Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o, overlays@g.o, qa@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] RFC: a few new rules for repositories in repositories.xml
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 15:28:19
Message-Id: 20150515172757.0e8f6b15@pomiot.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] RFC: a few new rules for repositories in repositories.xml by Ulrich Mueller
1 Dnia 2015-05-15, o godz. 17:00:21
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a):
3
4 > >>>>> On Fri, 15 May 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
5 >
6 > >> > 6. Repository must specify valid masters. All masters must be
7 > >> > available in repositories.xml.
8 > >>
9 > >> Except for the gentoo repository aka the portage tree. :)
10 >
11 > > $ layman -i gentoo
12 >
13 > > * gentoo
14 > > [...]
15 >
16 > Right, but I meant that the gentoo repository is an exception to the
17 > rule because it doesn't specify any masters.
18
19 Aye, that needs to be reworded a bit. How about...
20
21 | 6. Repository must specify a valid masters entry. All specified
22 | masters must be available in repositories.xml.
23
24 I think this one does permit empty masters.
25
26 --
27 Best regards,
28 Michał Górny