Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: k_f@g.o
Cc: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:12:30
Message-Id: 23368.60294.948038.832134@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29 by Kristian Fiskerstrand
1 >>>>> On Fri, 13 Jul 2018, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
2
3 >> /var/lib/{package-manager,pm}/gentoo
4 >> /var/cache/{package-manager,pm}/distfiles
5 >> /var/cache/{package-manager,pm}/packages
6
7 > I don't really like the cache variant here as that data should be
8 > able to be reconstructed by the application, which a distfile etc
9 > necessarily isn't (e.g for fetch restricted packages it might get
10 > lost),
11
12 If users keep precious distfiles in a separate dir (which can be
13 specified with PORTAGE_RO_DISTDIRS) then the distdir is pretty much a
14 cache.
15
16 > but /var/lib/package-manager/{repos,distfiles,packages} works well
17 > for me
18
19 That would work too, except that the top level of the gentoo repo
20 would be at /var/lib/package-manager/repos/gentoo, which is awkward to
21 type (especially if you compare it to /usr/portage) and has already
22 _five_ path components.
23
24 Ulrich

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-07-29 Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com>