1 |
Markos Chandras schrieb: |
2 |
> On 08/14/2011 01:19 PM, Thomas Sachau wrote: |
3 |
>> Markos Chandras schrieb: |
4 |
>>> Hi, |
5 |
>>> |
6 |
>>> This is the second item I would like to discuss for the next |
7 |
>>> Council agenda ( or a later one ) |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Quite a few of you know that Council acts as a court in case a |
10 |
>>> developer has unresolved disputes with Devrel or when he is not |
11 |
>>> happy with a Devrel's decision. The problem is that having the same |
12 |
>>> people in the Council and in Devrel makes no sense since the same |
13 |
>>> people will vote twice on that matter. A developer who wants to |
14 |
>>> appeal to Council, seeks a review of his case and a fresh voting |
15 |
>>> from new people. However, having devrel members, which are already |
16 |
>>> biased based on the previous decision, makes the "Council's court |
17 |
>>> role" a moot role :) |
18 |
> |
19 |
>> I have to ask the same here as for the other proposal: |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> Why do you restrict your proposal to a specific project? The issue |
22 |
>> you are pointing at is the same for any other project, where someone |
23 |
>> does open an appeal to council to vote on a team decision he does not |
24 |
>> want to accept. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I don't follow. I thought disputes were handled this way |
27 |
> |
28 |
> 1) Contact the guy and resolve the issue with him without bothering the |
29 |
> rest of team members |
30 |
> 2) Ask team lead |
31 |
> 3) Ask devrel |
32 |
> 4) Ask Council |
33 |
> |
34 |
> There is no way to go from 2->4 without devrel's involvement. |
35 |
|
36 |
So lets try with an example: |
37 |
|
38 |
A dev wants to join the Sunrise project and i as the lead say no to him. |
39 |
|
40 |
This means, both 1 and 2 are already done, 3 does not seem reasonable to me, since it looks unlikely |
41 |
to me, that DevRel could/should force a team to accept a new member, which would end with the last |
42 |
point. And if both sides keep their point, council could either force his addition, which will |
43 |
usually mean, that the team lead leaves or accept the decision of the team lead. |