1 |
On Tue, Jan 01, 2019 at 11:34:38PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> Since we now have an AUTHORS file in the Gentoo repository, I would |
3 |
> like to resubmit my original proposal from October 2018 about copyright |
4 |
> attribution [1]. That is, update the tree policy as follows: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> The simplified form of the copyright attribution according to |
7 |
> GLEP 76 [2], i.e., "Copyright YEARS Gentoo Authors", SHALL [3] |
8 |
> be used for ebuilds and profile files in the Gentoo repository. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The only change is that "SHALL" will be present instead of past tense. |
11 |
For the record, can you clarify what attribution should be used for the |
12 |
following files in the Gentoo repository? |
13 |
- eclasses |
14 |
- init files & other scripts |
15 |
- patches (written by a Gentoo developer vs external contributor) |
16 |
|
17 |
As a specific case, if a new package is submitted with an openrc init |
18 |
script written by the contributor, and they have their name in it; |
19 |
should that remain intact (and what should be done later when modifying |
20 |
that file). |
21 |
|
22 |
This would hopefully be the start of a attribution example guide that |
23 |
could provide clear examples (which don't belong in the GLEP itself). |
24 |
|
25 |
-- |
26 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
27 |
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer |
28 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
29 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
30 |
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136 |