1 |
This is a follow-up to the minor archs issue that was mostly resolved |
2 |
in September. |
3 |
|
4 |
The council agreed that: |
5 |
|
6 |
"If a maintainer has an open STABLEREQ, or a KEYWORDREQ blocking a |
7 |
pending STABLEREQ, for 90 days with archs CCed and otherwise ready |
8 |
to be stabilized, the maintainer can remove older stable versions of |
9 |
the package at their discretion. A package is considered ready to be |
10 |
stabilized if it has been in the tree for 30 days, and has no known |
11 |
major flaws on arches that upstream considers supported." |
12 |
|
13 |
Here is my follow-up: |
14 |
|
15 |
Are there any objections to changing "the maintainer can remove older stable |
16 |
versions of the package at their discretion" to "the maintainer can |
17 |
remove older versions of the package at their discretion?" In the |
18 |
case of a KEYWORDREQ the older version might not be stable. |
19 |
|
20 |
Surely if a stable version can be removed, an unstable one could be... |
21 |
|
22 |
This is actually coming up in practice, so I'd like the Council to |
23 |
tackle this at the next meeting, assuming that we can't just agree |
24 |
that this was what we meant all along. |
25 |
|
26 |
Rich |