Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 1/2 updates for the new old-school GLEP workflow
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 07:15:13
Message-Id: 1505459706.2185.14.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 1/2 updates for the new old-school GLEP workflow by Daniel Campbell
1 W dniu pią, 15.09.2017 o godzinie 00∶04 -0700, użytkownik Daniel
2 Campbell napisał:
3 > On 09/14/2017 11:54 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
4 > > W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 23∶45 -0700, użytkownik Daniel
5 > > Campbell napisał:
6 > > > On 09/14/2017 11:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
7 > > > > W dniu czw, 14.09.2017 o godzinie 14∶58 -0700, użytkownik Daniel
8 > > > > Campbell napisał:
9 > > > > > If I had to find a nitpick, it's a minor feature request: can we get a
10 > > > > > GLEP template file later on, to aid the initial drafting process? I
11 > > > > > didn't see it in the repo.
12 > > > >
13 > > > > I see your point. I always took some random late GLEP and wiped out
14 > > > > the contents. Maybe having a skel file with just the headings and empty
15 > > > > headers wouldn't be such a bad idea after all.
16 > > > >
17 > > > > I'm wondering if it belongs in the GLEP repo though. Maybe just
18 > > > > skel.rst? (given that www globs on glep-[0-9]...)
19 > > > >
20 > > >
21 > > > skel.rst would work I think; any file name that didn't disrupt
22 > > > automation would be good enough, though. No real preference.
23 > > >
24 > >
25 > > OTOH, I think we'll start by adding it to gentoo syntax packages for our
26 > > editors, so e.g. typing:
27 > >
28 > > $ vim glep-0100.rst
29 > >
30 > > you'd get the skel in place. I guess we'll see how good coverage that
31 > > has, and then decide if we need another skel in the repo.
32 > >
33 >
34 > Now that you mention it, putting it into syntax packages seems cleaner
35 > and editors could get automatic support. *And* this repository doesn't
36 > have to be touched...
37 >
38 > Maybe we have a winner? :p
39
40 Nah, we just wait for someone to tell us that he has an editor without
41 proper syntax packages ;-).
42
43 --
44 Best regards,
45 Michał Górny

Replies