Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Upcoming council meeting - Saturday, 18th of December, 1500 UTC | ||
| Date: | Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:33:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20101214083304.48823d6f@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Upcoming council meeting - Saturday, 18th of December, 1500 UTC by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:17:34 +0100 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > 2. To avoid such long delays as we have seen with EAPI 4, I would also |
| 4 | > like to suggest the following: New EAPI dependent features shall only |
| 5 | > be accepted if a preliminary patch for portage exists. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | You mean, "code it without doing any design"? |
| 8 | |
| 9 | I'll note that the original EAPI 4 list included *only* those features |
| 10 | that Zac said would be easy to implement, and a long list of things |
| 11 | developers wanted was left out because of that... The problem here's |
| 12 | not on the EAPI or PMS side. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | -- |
| 15 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Upcoming council meeting - Saturday, 18th of December, 1500 UTC | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |