| 1 |
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 11:03 AM Joonas Niilola <juippis@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 4/8/21 5:09 PM, Alec Warner wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Wed, Apr 7, 2021, 21:51 Joonas Niilola <juippis@g.o |
| 4 |
> > <mailto:juippis@g.o>> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Why hasn't this been switched yet? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > |
| 9 |
> > We don't have the infrastructure to support this yet. E.g. if we told |
| 10 |
> > people to do it our anon git service would likely fall over and stop |
| 11 |
> > working. |
| 12 |
> > |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> I like the "yet" part. Meantime, default to Github/gentoo-mirror? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I think you know that that's not going to be an acceptable solution |
| 17 |
for many people. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> One thing I was also thinking, how heavy is git as a package compared to |
| 20 |
> rsync in stage3. But to me, doesn't sound heavier at all, especially if |
| 21 |
> it's built with a lot of USE flags off. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
% equery size net-misc/rsync dev-vcs/git |
| 24 |
* net-misc/rsync-3.2.3-r2 |
| 25 |
Total files : 31 |
| 26 |
Total size : 979.02 KiB |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
* dev-vcs/git-2.26.3 |
| 29 |
Total files : 638 |
| 30 |
Total size : 31.70 MiB |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
A bit of a difference :) |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
I agree that we should be trending towards using git for emerge --sync. |
Archives