1 |
On Sun, 27 May 2012 08:14:27 +1000 |
2 |
Stuart Longland <redhatter@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On 27/05/12 7:04 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
5 |
> > If |
6 |
> > recombining them for the website is a nightmare then maybe leave |
7 |
> > them together |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Surely git submodules would help with this? |
10 |
|
11 |
No, I don't think so. The main thing about submodules is that every |
12 |
submodule is bound to a specific commit. Unless the main goal here is |
13 |
to step-update all three modules at once, it's not a good solution. |
14 |
|
15 |
And in this particular case, using submodules looks like 'let's keep |
16 |
two copies [hardlinks] of the same repository for no good reason'. |
17 |
|
18 |
-- |
19 |
Best regards, |
20 |
Michał Górny |