| 1 |
On Sunday, January 22, 2017 12:44:38 PM EST Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> Why would the Gentoo Council care more about the Java team than the |
| 4 |
> Java team itself does? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
When there is no team? Answer that one yourself. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Said another way. Why should the body responsible for Gentoo over all care at |
| 9 |
all if any areas of Gentoo are going neglected? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
If any area is being neglected is anyone in roles of leadership doing anything |
| 12 |
to correct such? Or just not carrying because others do not? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> > At the same time, if areas are going neglected, people are aware yet do |
| 15 |
> > nothing. What does that say? |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> That they don't care much about the specific areas being neglected? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Which means they do not care about Gentoo over all. They only care about the |
| 20 |
pieces they use or work with. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> The people who are going to be most motivated to contribute to |
| 23 |
> specific areas of Gentoo are those who care the most about those |
| 24 |
> specific areas. That's basically how Gentoo works. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Which again means no one cares about Gentoo over all. No one cares to bring |
| 27 |
all the pieces together. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Gentoo doesn't really work. That is part of the misnomer. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
-- |
| 32 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives