Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Pandu Poluan <pandu@××××××.info>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] New developer: Matt "prometheanfire" Thode
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 06:19:26
Message-Id: CAA2qdGXTfmDpLJXiHfDYE=oy3mK9wyjc11Zm-wR3evXQqXpFCQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] New developer: Matt "prometheanfire" Thode by "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto"
1 On Nov 11, 2011 9:56 AM, "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <
2 jmbsvicetto@g.o> wrote:
3 >
4 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
5 > Hash: SHA1
6 >
7 > Welcome aboard Matt.
8 >
9 > On 10-11-2011 05:28, Matt Thode wrote:
10 > > http://www.jmbsvicetto.name/ has them :P
11 > >
12 > > -- Matthew Thode
13 >
14 > > On Nov 9, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
15 > >
16 > >> Yay!
17 > >>
18 > >> Looking forward to up-to-date hardened stage3 tarballs for amd64
19 > >> ;-)
20 > >>
21 > >> Rgds,
22 >
23 > Pandu / others,
24 >
25 > so there's no confusion, the hardened team is not responsible for
26 > creating the stages (hardened or not).
27 > If there's anyone to "blame" for this, it's the release team and me in
28 > particular as the one responsible for the weekly builds for amd64 / x86.
29 > For anyone interested, this is assumed to be an issue with the release
30 > box doing the weekly stages[1]. That's why I've been creating new
31 > stages on my own hardware[2], using the official specs, and that we
32 > should be soon moving to a new box. The new box is similar to my own
33 > server, so there's no reason to believe the hardened stages will fail
34 > to build there.
35 >
36 > [1] - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=379777
37 > [2] - http://www.jmbsvicetto.name/releases/amd64/hardened/
38 >
39
40 Just not to be misunderstood, I'm not blaming anyone. In fact, I greatly am
41 respectful of Jorge's effort.
42
43 It *was* somewhat inconvenient to spend hours to upgrade
44 stage3-amd64-hardened to gcc-4.5.3, but I have learned my lesson, and now
45 maintain my own "stage3.1" tarballs.
46
47 I'm just thinking about people new to Gentoo who are looking for the above
48 stage3.
49
50 Anyways, thanks for the explanation, Jorge! Much appreciated :-)
51
52 Rgds,