Archives
Archives
| From: | Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: copyright attribution clarifications | ||
| Date: | Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:26:12 | ||
| Message-Id: | b0dada2b-cc20-c3ee-705e-77d73e71db15@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: copyright attribution clarifications by Sarah White |
||
| 1 | On 2018-11-23 3:23 p.m., Sarah White wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > |
| 4 | > Either way: multiline copyright notices are legally valid, |
| 5 | > or is that meant to be disputed? I'm not clear on the |
| 6 | > intent for this comment: |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > ["...don't have to be listed in a notice"] |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | legal validity != legal requirement |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: copyright attribution clarifications | Sarah White <kuzetsa@××××××××××.ovh> |