1 |
On Sat, 29 Mar 2014 08:50:36 -0400 |
2 |
"Anthony G. Basile" <basile@××××××××××××××.edu> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Okay I'd like to add an agenda item. A policy inspired by bug |
5 |
> #506034. |
6 |
|
7 |
(PS: Bug #506114 could be relevant to your item) |
8 |
|
9 |
Same here, let's take this a step further and extend this to profiles. |
10 |
A policy inspired by bug #435094 and bug #506142. |
11 |
|
12 |
> Motion: "Significant changes to virtuals are to be discussed (via |
13 |
> mailing list or bugzilla) with all the maintainers and/or herds which |
14 |
> maintain packages those virtuals depend on." |
15 |
|
16 |
Motion: "Significant changes to profiles are to be discussed (via |
17 |
mailing list or bugzilla) with all the maintainers and/or herds that |
18 |
rely on what gets changed in the profiles." |
19 |
|
20 |
> Discussion: "Like eclasses, changes to virtuals can affect all the |
21 |
> packages which depend on them. Changing existing virtuals, removing |
22 |
> virtuals or adding new ones affect the packages they depend on. When |
23 |
> such a change is proposed, all maintainers affected need to be |
24 |
> included in the discussion." |
25 |
|
26 |
Discussion: "Like eclasses and virtuals, changes to the profiles affect |
27 |
a set of packages at once. For instance, adding or removing a mask or |
28 |
force can result in something becoming forced or optional. If something |
29 |
is assumed to be forced, or optional; it can result in breakage, we |
30 |
would like to prevent huge breakage. When such change is proposed, all |
31 |
maintainers affected need to be included in the discussion." |
32 |
|
33 |
Concern: "Unawareness, possible breakage and a lack of cooperation." |
34 |
|
35 |
-- |
36 |
With kind regards, |
37 |
|
38 |
Tom Wijsman (TomWij) |
39 |
Gentoo Developer |
40 |
|
41 |
E-mail address : TomWij@g.o |
42 |
GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D |
43 |
GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D |