| 1 |
On pią, 2017-07-21 at 23:07 +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
| 2 |
> > If you have any ideas how to improve the page even more, possibly |
| 3 |
> > classify the needs better, your comments will also be most welcome. |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Make (part of) the the requirements more clear and semi-formal. E.g., have a |
| 7 |
> switch "not required / soft requirement / hard requirement", which maybe |
| 8 |
> changes table sorting: |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> * Must be Gentoo dev? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Kinda makes sense. I wonder if we should also have a special category |
| 13 |
for proxied maintainers there. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> * (what else?) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I was thinking of some kind of 'topic'. Like, some jobs involve package |
| 19 |
maintenance, some just testing, and some upstream code development. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Maybe it'd be worth to consider it as some kind of tag/keyword system. |
| 22 |
Otherwise, I feel like soon enough it's going to have 10 questions or so |
| 23 |
;-). |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> The table is a bit silly in the sense that part of it addresses devs, part |
| 27 |
> not... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
Archives