| 1 |
On 24.02.2020 11:39, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 11:36 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote: |
| 3 |
>> As a result we have more busywork, this all can be conveyed to Council |
| 4 |
>> directly. Also this is unclear to me how a review body will decide what |
| 5 |
>> to appeal and what hot to, as the data is still being kept private and |
| 6 |
>> reviewers are going to only have a decision on hands. Having only |
| 7 |
>> decision is not enough to start thinking ComRel did anything wrong |
| 8 |
>> (well, unless there were direct rules violation, which, to my knowledge |
| 9 |
>> has never been the case). |
| 10 |
> The whole point is that the review body has direct access to all |
| 11 |
> the data (i.e. bugzilla privs, comrel@ alias, IRC channels). Unlike |
| 12 |
> your 'individual' it is considered trusted and therefore you don't have |
| 13 |
> to 'prepare' data for it. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Then as a result you are going to have yet another semi-closed process |
| 16 |
which does not make the entire procedure more transparent (which was the |
| 17 |
main concern of this thread). |
Archives