| 1 |
On 2012.10.19 14:52, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: |
| 2 |
> Hey all -- there was just a discussion in #gentoo-dev about this, so |
| 3 |
> following up here.. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Due to the fact that an EAPI-bump can imply different behaviour from |
| 6 |
> eclasses or the PM, an EAPI-bump should in most cases also require an |
| 7 |
> ebuild revbump. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Why i'm bringing this up here, is because Chansaw and I were |
| 10 |
> wondering |
| 11 |
> if common sense will not be enough to ensure this and it should be |
| 12 |
> made a policy to revbump when migrating to a new EAPI ? |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Common sense is much rarer than you might expect. |
| 17 |
It should be explicit. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Regards, |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Roy Bamford |
| 23 |
(Neddyseagoon) a member of |
| 24 |
elections |
| 25 |
gentoo-ops |
| 26 |
forum-mods |
| 27 |
trustees |
Archives